.png "Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs Dimensity 7200 AnTuTu Benchmark Chart")
Two mid-range chips from 2023 still power phones that sell widely in 2026, and the verdict between them is closer than their reputations suggest. Across aggregated benchmark data compiled by Nanoreview, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 wins the totals: about 5 percent higher on AnTuTu 11, roughly 15 percent faster in multi-core Geekbench 6, and a much stronger GPU sub-score. But the Dimensity 7200, and its 7200 Ultra variant, actually edges the single-core test and the user experience sub-score, which is where everyday scrolling and app launches live.
The phone-level picture is the interesting part, and it is what this comparison is really about. The same Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 posts a Geekbench multi-core score of 2,967 in the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, 3,216 in the vivo V40, and 3,360 in the Honor 200, a spread of more than 13 percent from one phone to the next. Battery results diverge even harder: 91mobiles' PCMark testing returned 9 hours 38 minutes for the Honor 200 and 13 hours for the vivo V40. The chip sets the ceiling; the phone determines how close you get to it.
One data caution before the tables: AnTuTu versions differ across sources, and Nanoreview's v11 figures are not directly comparable with the v10-era scores published by GSMArena and 91mobiles. The Geekbench 6 columns are comparable across all sources. Every figure below is one reading from the cited source, not a physical constant, and PetaTech24 ran none of these tests. Here is the chip battle first, then the phones.
Table 1: Chip Head-to-Head, AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6
Source: Nanoreview aggregated data, 160 tests for the Snapdragon against 31 for the Dimensity, September 2026. The four sub-scores shown sum to the AnTuTu totals in the first row.
Table 2: Which Phone Gets What Score
Sources: Nanoreview phone pages for the Redmi and Motorola, GSMArena lab tests for the vivo V40, 91mobiles testing for the Honor 200 and the V40 Geekbench figures. One reconciliation: GSMArena's V40 lab page records 818,546 on an AnTuTu v10 run, while 91mobiles records 810,653 for the same phone; Table 2 uses the GSMArena figure.
Table 3: Chip Essentials and Real Graphics
Sources: Wild Life Extreme and Steel Nomad Light from Nanoreview's Dimensity 7200 Ultra data and GSMArena's vivo V40 lab results. Method note: the Dimensity figures are a Nanoreview aggregate for the 7200 Ultra, while the Snapdragon figures come from a single vivo V40 lab run; treat the gaps as indicative rather than controlled.
Single-core, UX, and daily feel
The Dimensity 7200's 3 percent single-core win and 30 percent UX sub-score advantage are the numbers behind its reputation for feeling smooth in daily use. Single-threaded speed drives app launches and interface response, and the MediaTek chip holds its own there against a newer rival, helped by a slightly higher 2.8GHz peak clock on its two performance cores. The Snapdragon answers with a three-tier core layout, one prime plus three gold plus four efficiency cores, which is why it pulls ahead once work spreads across cores.
GPU and gaming
The AnTuTu GPU sub-score gap, 45 percent, is the largest single difference between these chips, but the real-world graphics story is narrower. In 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, the vivo V40's Snapdragon posts 1,492 against roughly 1,179 for the 7200 Ultra camp, about 26 percent in an uncontrolled pairing, and in the newer Steel Nomad Light test the gap shrinks to 495 against 463, under 7 percent. Neither chip is a gaming flagship; both run demanding titles at medium settings. If gaming is the priority, the Snapdragon is the safer pick, but the Dimensity is closer than the AnTuTu sub-score suggests.
Battery is the phone's job
The clearest lesson in the phone-level data is that battery life cannot be predicted from the chip alone. 91mobiles' PCMark battery testing returned 13 hours for the vivo V40 and 9 hours 38 minutes for the Honor 200, two phones running the identical Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; the difference comes down to capacity, display, and software tuning rather than silicon. Buyers comparing mid-rangers should check the specific phone's endurance results, not just its chipset.
.png)
Where the mid-range stands in 2026
Both chips are now years behind the mid-range state of the art, but the successor data is a warning against easy upgrade math. In the same Nanoreview dataset, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 posts about 1.04 million on AnTuTu 11, roughly 1.6 percent above the 7 Gen 3, and 3,390 in Geekbench multi-core, a mid-teens gain. The Dimensity 7300 lands near 879,000 on AnTuTu, which actually trails the 7200 in this dataset, a device-mix and data-vintage effect rather than a silicon regression. Successor gains, in short, run from single digits to mid-teens depending on the test. Phones carrying the two 2023 chips now sit at the clearance end of the market: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+, the Dimensity's flagship carrier, tracks around $300 to $345 in the US and €222 to €239 in Europe in Amazon listings compiled by GSMArena, which is why this comparison still gets searched.
Quick answers
Bottom line
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is the stronger mid-range chip: it wins the totals, the multi-core tests, and every graphics benchmark. The Dimensity 7200 is not outclassed: it wins single-core and the UX sub-score, and its real-world graphics deficit is 7 to 26 percent, not the 45 percent the AnTuTu sub-score implies. The phone-level table is the honest guide here, because the same silicon scores differently in every chassis, and battery endurance tracks the phone, not the chip. For a buyer in 2026: pick the phone first, the chip second, and let the discount settle the rest.
Sources and what each claims
Nanoreview chip comparison pages (September 2026): AnTuTu 11 totals and sub-scores for the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Dimensity 7200, and 7200 Ultra, Geekbench 6 figures, sample counts, and the 7s Gen 3 and Dimensity 7300 successor data. (nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-7-gen-3-vs-mediatek-dimensity-7200)
Nanoreview phone comparison (September 2026): Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G scores of 1,193 and 2,693 in Geekbench 6 with 977,841 on AnTuTu 11, and Motorola Edge 50 Pro scores of 1,131 and 2,967 with 1,090,709. (nanoreview.net/en/phone-compare/xiaomi-redmi-note-13-pro-plus-vs-motorola-edge-50-pro)
GSMArena vivo V40 page and lab tests (accessed Sept 10, 2026): the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 platform details, AnTuTu v9 and v10 results, Geekbench figures, and the 1,492 Wild Life Extreme score. (gsmarena.com/vivo_v40-13121.php)
91mobiles benchmark pages (accessed Sept 10, 2026): Honor 200 AnTuTu 825,206 with Geekbench 1,167 and 3,360, and vivo V40 AnTuTu 810,653 with Geekbench 1,164 and 3,216, plus PCMark battery results of 13 hours for the V40 and 9 hours 38 minutes for the Honor 200. (91mobiles.com/honor-200-price-in-india and 91mobiles.com/vivo-v40-price-in-india, benchmark tabs)
Nanoreview Dimensity 7200 Ultra page (accessed Sept 10, 2026): the 1,179 Wild Life Extreme and 463 Steel Nomad Light graphics figures. (nanoreview.net/en/soc/mediatek-dimensity-7200-ultra)
GSMArena Redmi Note 13 Pro+ price page (accessed Sept 10, 2026): tracked Amazon listings of $344.85 and $299.99 in the US, and €239.00 and €221.78 in Europe, for the 256GB and 512GB models. (gsmarena.com, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ price page)
Editorial note: PetaTech24 ran none of these benchmarks. All scores are attributed to the sources above, AnTuTu versions are labeled because v10 and v11 results are not comparable, and aggregated figures draw on different sample sizes, 160 tests for the Snapdragon against 31 for the Dimensity. Where two sources published different figures for the same phone, as with the vivo V40's AnTuTu result, both are disclosed. Scores vary by device, firmware, and run.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png&description=Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs Dimensity 7200: Benchmarks, Gaming & Phone Tests Compared){kind=link}
0 Comments